Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Hazem Naow vs Adrien Gobat Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Naow vs Gobat analysis and find out who is favored!
Hazem Naow vs Adrien Gobat Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Naow 1 - 0 Gobat
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naow has won 48.86% of points on their second serve, while Gobat has won 47.63%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naow, in recent form, has won 56.54% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gobat has won 56.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.77% and 32.71% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Naow has saved 62.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gobat has saved 55.47% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Naow has won 67.95% of matches played (W/L 53/ 25), with Gobat winning 58.7% (W/L 27/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Naow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 65/ 27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 55/ 39). Gobat has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 47/ 20), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 18/ 24).
- Player level: In the last year, Naow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.92% of matches (W/L 35/ 13), where as Gobat has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.5% of matches (W/L 23/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Naow winning 1 times and Gobat being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Naow winning 2 and Gobat winning 0. The last match between Naow and Gobat was at the Cherbourg Challenger, 12-02-2024, Q3, I.hard with Hazem Naow getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Naow and Gobat have played a deciding set 0 times, with Naow winning 0 times and Gobat 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Naow winning 1, and Gobat 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naow has played against opponents with an average rank of 194.63 while Gobat has played against players with an average rank of 183.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naow has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gobat has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Naow has converted 43.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gobat has converted 44.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
345
Rank
323
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
730
Rank
532
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
65% (152-81)
Career Total W/L
58% (82-59)
71% (27-11)
YTD W/L
53% (10-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Hazem Naow vs Adrien Gobat For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Naow VS Gobat
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Hazem Naow | Adrien Gobat |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:40 | 1:47:40 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (47/71) | 44% (35/80) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (35/47) | 69% (24/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (14/24) | 42% (19/45) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (37/80) | 31% (22/71) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-1 |
Stats 
Hazem Naow
Player
Adrien Gobat
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
44%
(
35 of
80)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Hazem Naow | Adrien Gobat |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (27/11) | 53% (10/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (56/29) | 53% (24/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (433/350) | 53% (232/209) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 76% (19/6) | 43% (3/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.34 |
| Aces Total | 78 | 74 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 137 | 63 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:10 | 1:57:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 255.76 | 107.68 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1634/2598) | 53% (745/1419) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (1126/1634) | 73% (541/745) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (471/964) | 48% (321/674) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (130/300) | 45% (67/150) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (1096/2554) | 42% (574/1379) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 68% (15/7) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (12/3) | 53% (9/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (27/38) | 53% (10/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 44% (4/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (23/23) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (23/0) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (15/4) | 22% (9/2) |
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Hazem Naow
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
73)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Hazem Naow
95%
(
54 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
85%
(
52 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Hazem Naow
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Hazem Naow
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Hazem Naow
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Mae Malige
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
36%
(
15 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Dario Huber
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Hazem Naow
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Michael Geerts
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Adrien Gobat Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrien Gobat
Player
Liova Ajavon
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
103
Total Points Won
75
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Adrien Gobat
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
0
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
47%
(
45 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
93
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Adrien Gobat
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
51%
(
57 of
111)
5
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
2
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
111)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrien Gobat
Player
Loann Massard
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fred Simonsson
Player
Adrien Gobat
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
89)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrien Gobat
Player
Andrew Fenty
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Adrien Gobat
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrien Gobat
Player
Ezekiel Clark
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrien Gobat
Player
Keisuke Saitoh
46%
(
31 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
5
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
0
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Naow Vs Gobat Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Naow are available here and Gobat photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
